Artec Jet vs. Matterport Pro 3 vs. NavVis VLX 3
An objective, spec-by-spec look at three popular reality-capture platforms. Many operators today run a stationary camera for interiors plus a separate drone for aerial. The question this comparison answers: which system consolidates that workflow into one sensor — without giving up speed, range, or accuracy?
| Specification | Matterport Pro 3Stationary LiDAR camera | NavVis VLX 3Wearable mobile SLAM | Artec JetMulti-modal mobile SLAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capture method | Stop-and-go: set tripod, scan, reposition | Walk-through SLAM, wearable vest | Continuous SLAM + AI autonomy |
| Stated accuracy | ±20 mm @ 10 m | ~5 mm (controlled test) | ±10 mm indoor/UG; ±15 mm general ±5 mm change detection · RTK option |
| Working range | 20 m models / 100 m E57 only | ~50 m operational | 0.5 – 300 m |
| Point capture rate | 100,000 pts/sec | Dual 32-layer LiDAR (high density) | 1.9 million pts/sec (triple return) |
| Deployment modes | Tripod only | Wearable only | 7 modes: handheld, backpack, drone, vehicle, robot, cage, pole |
| Ground + aerial in one device | No — ground only | No — ground only | Yes — one sensor, handheld or drone-mounted |
| Weight | ~1.6 kg head (+ tripod) | 8.5 kg worn | 1.57 kg |
| GPS-denied / low-light | Indoor & outdoor; daylight OK | SLAM works GPS-denied | SLAM + active LiDAR: tunnels, mines, zero-light · IP65 |
| Software & output | Matterport cloud (tours) · E57 | NavVis IVION (mature AEC suite) · E57 / LAS | Artec Twins; merges with Ray II TLS · LAS / LAZ / PLY / E57 + RGB |
| Best-fit use | Virtual tours, real estate, as-built docs | Scan-to-BIM, surveying, facility management | Site-scale capture, infrastructure, mining, ground + air |
| Cost & data ownership | Camera + subscription by “active spaces”; paid add-on to export data | Hardware + metered cloud processing (per m²; units expire yearly) | One-time purchase — you own & export your data, no per-use fees |
Specifications from manufacturer-published figures (Artec 3D, NavVis, Matterport), 2026. Real-world accuracy varies with environment, scan path, loop closures, and use of control points / RTK.
Where each system wins
Matterport Pro 3
The most affordable way into LiDAR-based digital twins and is the standard for polished virtual tours. Best when you only need indoor/outdoor walkthroughs and basic measurements — not survey-grade point clouds or large-site capture.
NavVis VLX 3
An excellent wearable system that edges the Jet on published point-cloud accuracy, backed by NavVis IVION — a mature, widely adopted built-environment software suite. The trade-off: it is wearable-only.
Artec Jet
The only system here that covers both ground and aerial capture from one sensor — handheld on the ground, drone-mounted in the air. Quick-swap across handheld, backpack, drone, and vehicle — 300 m range, 1.9 M pts/sec, 1.57 kg, GPS-denied and zero-light capable.
What it really costs to own your data
Matterport Pro 3
~$6,000 camera, then an ongoing subscription priced by “active spaces” (live, accessible tours) — from free (1 space) to ~$309/mo (100 spaces), billed annually. Your tours live in Matterport’s cloud; exporting the raw 3D data needs the paid MatterPak add-on, and reactivating an archived space runs ~$9.99 each. Stop paying and your deliverables go offline.
NavVis VLX 3
Hardware bundles with a multi-year software subscription. To process raw scans you buy IVION Processing units plus IVION Core sized by square meters — metered within 10 m of your scan path. Units are non-refundable and expire after a year, reprocessing consumes more, and every file you download (point clouds, panoramas, logs) counts against storage.
Artec Jet
A one-time hardware purchase that ships with Artec Twins for local processing, merging, georeferencing, and export — with a lifetime software-license option. No “active-space” hosting fees, no per-square-meter processing meter, no per-file export charge. Export open formats (LAS, LAZ, PLY, E57) you keep and control.
Pricing models per manufacturer documentation, 2026. Matterport allows transferring tours to your own account, and NavVis offers an on-premise desktop-processing option; the figures above reflect each platform’s standard model. Confirm current terms with each vendor.
The bottom line
If you only ever need indoor virtual tours, Matterport is the cheapest entry point. NavVis VLX 3 is a strong wearable with tighter stated accuracy — but it is wearable-only and meters processing by the square meter. If you are running a stationary camera plus a drone today, the Artec Jet gives you one LiDAR sensor for both — handheld on the ground and drone-mounted in the air — and it is the only system here where you buy once and own your data outright — no “active-space” hosting fees, no per-area or per-export charges, no recurring data bill.
Frequently asked questions
What are the key differences between Matterport, NavVis, and the Artec Jet?
All three create 3D point clouds, but they are built for different jobs. Matterport is a stationary, tripod-based camera — the simplest, lowest-cost route into 3D digital twins and virtual tours, but with the lowest accuracy of the three and cloud hosting on a subscription. NavVis is a wearable mobile-mapping system you walk through a site with; it has the highest accuracy (about ±5 mm) and suits scan-to-BIM and surveying, but captures from the ground only and meters processing by area. The Artec Jet is also mobile mapping, but the same device works handheld and drone-mounted — capturing ground and air in one workflow. It is the fastest, with the longest range, around ±10 mm accuracy, and a one-time purchase where you own and export your data with no per-use fees. In short: Matterport for the simplest tours, NavVis when maximum accuracy is the priority, and the Artec Jet when you need speed, range, versatility, and full data ownership for large sites.
Can the Artec Jet replace both my Matterport and my drone?
Not on its own — and it's an important distinction. The Artec Jet is a single SLAM LiDAR sensor, not a drone. On the ground it runs handheld (or on a backpack, pole, or vehicle), so it can take over the site and interior capture you'd otherwise do with a Matterport. For aerial work you mount the Jet onto a drone as its payload — so you still fly a drone, but the Jet becomes the sensor, with AI-assisted autonomous flight. The real advantage is that one sensor covers both ground and air in a single, consistent LiDAR workflow: capture what you can reach by hand, mount the same unit on a drone for what you can't, and process it all as one registered point cloud — instead of running a separate ground scanner and a separate aerial camera. Matterport (tripod) and NavVis VLX 3 (wearable) are ground-only and can't be flown at all.
Is the Artec Jet more accurate than the NavVis VLX 3?
Not on the headline number. NavVis publishes roughly 5 mm point-cloud accuracy in a controlled test, while the Jet lists about ±10 mm indoors/underground and ±15 mm in general environments, with ±5 mm change detection and an RTK option for georeferencing. The Jet's advantages are range (300 m vs ~50 m), point rate (1.9 M pts/sec), weight (1.57 kg vs 8.5 kg), and multi-platform deployment. Choose based on whether your priority is the tightest indoor accuracy or one versatile system for whole-site capture.
How much faster is mobile SLAM than a Matterport Pro 3?
Matterport is a stop-and-go workflow: you set the tripod, capture for under 20 seconds, then physically move and repeat. SLAM systems like the Jet and the VLX 3 capture continuously while you walk (or fly), which manufacturers commonly cite as up to about 10× faster than tripod scanning on large sites — with the gap widening as the site grows.
Does the Artec Jet work where there is no GPS or no light?
Yes. SLAM positioning works without GPS by matching geometric features in the environment, so it functions in tunnels, mines, indoor plants, and underground spaces. Because LiDAR is an active sensor that emits its own laser pulses, the Jet also captures in complete darkness. It is rated IP65 for dust and water resistance in the field.
Do I own my data, and are there ongoing or per-use fees?
With the Artec Jet you make a one-time hardware purchase, process locally in Artec Twins, and export open formats (LAS, LAZ, PLY, E57) that you keep and control — with no hosting subscription, no per-square-meter processing meter, and no per-file export charge. By contrast, Matterport hosts your tours in its cloud on a subscription tied to “active spaces,” with raw-data export (MatterPak) as a paid add-on; and NavVis meters cloud processing by square meter using units that expire after a year, with every downloaded file counting against storage. For high-volume capture, that recurring cost difference compounds quickly.
What file formats does the Artec Jet export?
The Jet outputs LAS, LAZ, PLY, and E57 point clouds with intensity, range, time, return, and ring attributes, plus optional RGB / true color. It processes in Artec Twins and can be merged with Artec Ray II terrestrial scans to combine full-site SLAM coverage with high-detail fixed-position accuracy.